|
iStormIt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@jondoe4171 -.-
DopingBox (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@jondoe4171 no. fucking. shit
jondoe4171 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That was CGI. Unless a cameraman was following it around. The vid was for schoolkids ( maybe ) to show what it will do when it lands on Mars.
AllanFrankland (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@joroma77 I hate people like you.Mars doe's have gravity and still even if it had none you would sill be able to land the rover on.
113001596 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@joroma77 I would keep quiet if I were you, you're making a monkey of yourself
TheyCallMeZems (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@joroma77 please eat a dick, or better yet, go hang yourself because obviously you cannot make a single contribution to today's society with your conspiracy bullshit. You do not have the capacity to understand anything, especially the science behind sending a rover to mars. I suggest you do not have kids as the world already has enough dumbshits.
Dalekfans (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
When the arm came out at 7:45 I thought it was going to be a small hammer.
joroma77 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The fact that people think that a 3D animation and reddish desert photos prove NASA sent vehicles to Mars is a token of blind faith. 1) It has up until this very moment been impossible to put people on the moon and 2) I have not seen a shred of evidence to support the veracity of the Mars missions. Try landing an object with a parachute in a 6 millibar atmosphere... You folks are science fiction nerds who would believe anything a scientist says.
kayam2011 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's showing you the mission as it was in real life
kayam2011 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Of course it computer graphics ????? F*$! me! What the hell did you think it was??? Someone on a 747 Boeing following the mars mission!!!!!! Pmsl!!!!!!! |
